Hilfswissenschaften
Ich erinnere mich sehr deutlich, dass die detaillierte Erschließung (mit Provenienzen) des gedruckten Produkts ÖNB-Ink (Inkunabelkatalog der Österreichischen Nationalbibliothek Wien) Eingang gefunden hatte in eine Wiener Inkunabelkatalog-Datenbank. Diese Daten sind offenkundig nicht mehr online. Merke: Die Wiener Stümper stehen den Münchnern nur wenig nach.
https://archiv.twoday.net/search?q=%C3%B6nb-ink
Update:
https://plus.google.com/u/0/108642235016882389621/posts/6Jmde5d7Zmk
https://archiv.twoday.net/search?q=%C3%B6nb-ink
Update:
https://plus.google.com/u/0/108642235016882389621/posts/6Jmde5d7Zmk
KlausGraf - am Samstag, 16. Juni 2012, 12:28 - Rubrik: Hilfswissenschaften
noch kein Kommentar - Kommentar verfassen
Ein [sog.] Mainzer Karmeliter-Einband
ehemals in der Öffentlichen Bibliothek Meiningen:
Langer Link
Zur Meininger Bibliothek:
https://www.ub.uni-dortmund.de/listen/inetbib/msg20556.html
https://www.aedph-old.uni-bayreuth.de/2001/0417.html
Update zur Werkstatt von Annelen Ottermann:
"Die durch den Hilfsnamen "Mainz Karmeliter-Meister" nahegelegte Verbindung mit einer Einbandwerkstatt des Mainzer Karmeliterklosters ist so sicher nicht ohne weiteres aufrecht zu erhalten. Insofern empfehle ich Zurückhaltung bei der Zuschreibung "a binding by the Carmelite Convent of Mainz, ca. 1478", auch wenn inzwischen ca. ein Dutzend Inkunabeln aus Mainzer Karmeliterprovenienz aus der Werkstatt "M mit Krone" nachgewiesen werden konnten. (Näheres in Speyer bei der AEB-Tagung)"
Update von Paul Needham:
https://dlist.server.uni-frankfurt.de/pipermail/provenienz/2012-June/000526.html
ehemals in der Öffentlichen Bibliothek Meiningen:
Langer Link
Zur Meininger Bibliothek:
https://www.ub.uni-dortmund.de/listen/inetbib/msg20556.html
https://www.aedph-old.uni-bayreuth.de/2001/0417.html
Update zur Werkstatt von Annelen Ottermann:
"Die durch den Hilfsnamen "Mainz Karmeliter-Meister" nahegelegte Verbindung mit einer Einbandwerkstatt des Mainzer Karmeliterklosters ist so sicher nicht ohne weiteres aufrecht zu erhalten. Insofern empfehle ich Zurückhaltung bei der Zuschreibung "a binding by the Carmelite Convent of Mainz, ca. 1478", auch wenn inzwischen ca. ein Dutzend Inkunabeln aus Mainzer Karmeliterprovenienz aus der Werkstatt "M mit Krone" nachgewiesen werden konnten. (Näheres in Speyer bei der AEB-Tagung)"
Update von Paul Needham:
https://dlist.server.uni-frankfurt.de/pipermail/provenienz/2012-June/000526.html
KlausGraf - am Mittwoch, 13. Juni 2012, 21:28 - Rubrik: Hilfswissenschaften
noch kein Kommentar - Kommentar verfassen
In https://archiv.twoday.net/stories/64975739/ fragte ich nach dem Verbleib des Bücherzeichens von Hans Ras of Koester, der eine später in Wernigerode befindliche niederdeutsche Bibel-Inkunabel an seine Nichten im Emmericher Agnetenkloster schenkte. Ich bin Paul Needham für seine gründliche Aufklärung des Falls außerordentlich dankbar. Needham schreibt:
"The edition in question is definitely GW 4308, and not 4307. In late 1936 and early 1937 John H. Scheide (d. 1942, father of the present owner, William H. Scheide, born in 1914) bought two copies of GW 4308, which was the last lacuna in his ambition to collect all printed Bibles in German preceding the Luther “September Testament” (of which he also owned a copy); and in the United States, only the Scheide Library has copies of all these editions.
Copy 1 = the two-volume set offered by Sotheby’s in their A. W. M. Mensing sale, London, 15 December 1936, lot 65. This copy belonged earlier to Jan Six van Hillegom, whose books were auctioned in Amsterdam by Frederik Muller, 17 Oct. 1928.
This copy was imperfect, and especially lacked the preliminary quire of 4 leaves (the first blank) with preface and summaries of the books of the Bible. However, John Scheide learned that in NYC, the dealer Lathrop C. Harper had an incomplete copy of vol. I only, which he also bought – that is,
Copy 2 = the Stolberg-Wernigerode copy, containing the preliminary quire and Genesis-Job only, and lacking at least one leaf within that range. As I understand it, the best books of the Wernigerode library were acquired by Martin Breslauer (Berlin) as he announced in the spring of 1930, and a large number of them were presented in his Kat. 49 (1931), which unfortunately I have not seen. Thus, there is a possibility that this vol. I of GW 4308 is described in that catalogue.
John Scheide took leaves out of the Stolberg-Wernigerode copy, and had them bound into the Six-Mensing copy, to complete or improve it. Therefore, the evidence of the Johannes Ras ownership is now divided in the Scheide Library! [And, conversely, John Scheide took some leaves out of the Six-Mensing copy, and they are now laid, loose, into the Stolberg-Wernigerode copy …]
“Copy 2” (Scheide 6.4.1): the vellum pastedown of this binding bears the name and painted arms of Johannes Ras, as reported in that old issue of Ex libris which you cited. By the way, the binding is not original – it is perhaps early 18th century, sheep with blind lozenge-pattern fillets over thick wooden boards (possibly, the boards are 15th century, but I am not sure of that). In any case, it is fortunate that this pastedown was preserved.
The other Ras ownership in the volume is the presentation inscription written on fo. 252v, the end of Job. This suggests that the Ras copy never had the quires containing Psalms.
“Copy 1” (Scheide 8.7.3-4): now contains fos. 2-11 from (Stolberg) “Copy 2”, with 3 documents of Ras ownership:
fo. 2r: in the initial are painted the arms of Ras, marshaled with those of “Someone” (his wife’s family?)
fo. 4v: the Ras presentation inscription, substantially identical to that of 252v of “Copy 2”. Please note: the first three lines of the inscription are written directly on 4v; the following three lines are written, smaller, on a separate strip of paper, which is pasted to the bottom margin of 4v.
fo. 5r: note the woodcut compartment at the foot of the page, showing the Madonna and visitation of the Magi. In the shield on the right are the arms of Cologne. The shield on the left is blank, to allow an owner’s arms to be painted in. In this copy, the arms are those of “Someone”, as on 2r."
"The edition in question is definitely GW 4308, and not 4307. In late 1936 and early 1937 John H. Scheide (d. 1942, father of the present owner, William H. Scheide, born in 1914) bought two copies of GW 4308, which was the last lacuna in his ambition to collect all printed Bibles in German preceding the Luther “September Testament” (of which he also owned a copy); and in the United States, only the Scheide Library has copies of all these editions.
Copy 1 = the two-volume set offered by Sotheby’s in their A. W. M. Mensing sale, London, 15 December 1936, lot 65. This copy belonged earlier to Jan Six van Hillegom, whose books were auctioned in Amsterdam by Frederik Muller, 17 Oct. 1928.
This copy was imperfect, and especially lacked the preliminary quire of 4 leaves (the first blank) with preface and summaries of the books of the Bible. However, John Scheide learned that in NYC, the dealer Lathrop C. Harper had an incomplete copy of vol. I only, which he also bought – that is,
Copy 2 = the Stolberg-Wernigerode copy, containing the preliminary quire and Genesis-Job only, and lacking at least one leaf within that range. As I understand it, the best books of the Wernigerode library were acquired by Martin Breslauer (Berlin) as he announced in the spring of 1930, and a large number of them were presented in his Kat. 49 (1931), which unfortunately I have not seen. Thus, there is a possibility that this vol. I of GW 4308 is described in that catalogue.
John Scheide took leaves out of the Stolberg-Wernigerode copy, and had them bound into the Six-Mensing copy, to complete or improve it. Therefore, the evidence of the Johannes Ras ownership is now divided in the Scheide Library! [And, conversely, John Scheide took some leaves out of the Six-Mensing copy, and they are now laid, loose, into the Stolberg-Wernigerode copy …]
“Copy 2” (Scheide 6.4.1): the vellum pastedown of this binding bears the name and painted arms of Johannes Ras, as reported in that old issue of Ex libris which you cited. By the way, the binding is not original – it is perhaps early 18th century, sheep with blind lozenge-pattern fillets over thick wooden boards (possibly, the boards are 15th century, but I am not sure of that). In any case, it is fortunate that this pastedown was preserved.
The other Ras ownership in the volume is the presentation inscription written on fo. 252v, the end of Job. This suggests that the Ras copy never had the quires containing Psalms.
“Copy 1” (Scheide 8.7.3-4): now contains fos. 2-11 from (Stolberg) “Copy 2”, with 3 documents of Ras ownership:
fo. 2r: in the initial are painted the arms of Ras, marshaled with those of “Someone” (his wife’s family?)
fo. 4v: the Ras presentation inscription, substantially identical to that of 252v of “Copy 2”. Please note: the first three lines of the inscription are written directly on 4v; the following three lines are written, smaller, on a separate strip of paper, which is pasted to the bottom margin of 4v.
fo. 5r: note the woodcut compartment at the foot of the page, showing the Madonna and visitation of the Magi. In the shield on the right are the arms of Cologne. The shield on the left is blank, to allow an owner’s arms to be painted in. In this copy, the arms are those of “Someone”, as on 2r."
KlausGraf - am Samstag, 2. Juni 2012, 00:16 - Rubrik: Hilfswissenschaften
noch kein Kommentar - Kommentar verfassen
https://193.43.102.66/iguana/www.main.cls?v=9b21bf8c-18c4-11e1-9e67-5056b2001200&locProfile=INC
Die normale Suche ist nutzlos, da sie nicht das findet, was in der Datenbank drin ist. Eigentlich findet sie standardmäßig NICHTS. Siehe etwa Suche nach lirer: kein Treffer, obwohl Lirers Schwäbische Chronik mit der Ansetzungsform Lirer erfasst ist, was man beim browsenden Suchen feststellt. Provenienzen gibts auch nicht. Es ist ein Jammer, dass solch wunderbares Kulturgut in den Händen perfider Pfaffen ist.
Die normale Suche ist nutzlos, da sie nicht das findet, was in der Datenbank drin ist. Eigentlich findet sie standardmäßig NICHTS. Siehe etwa Suche nach lirer: kein Treffer, obwohl Lirers Schwäbische Chronik mit der Ansetzungsform Lirer erfasst ist, was man beim browsenden Suchen feststellt. Provenienzen gibts auch nicht. Es ist ein Jammer, dass solch wunderbares Kulturgut in den Händen perfider Pfaffen ist.
KlausGraf - am Donnerstag, 17. Mai 2012, 23:53 - Rubrik: Hilfswissenschaften
https://orka.bibliothek.uni-kassel.de/viewer/image/1336391718048/1/
Abdruck: Bernhardi, Karl: Abdruck einer bisher unbekannten Schenkungsurkunde zu Gunsten des Stifts Hersfeld vom 29. Aug. 835 (854?). In: ZHG, Bd. 6 (1854), S. 351-355
https://books.google.de/books?id=a6VJAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA351
Abdruck: Bernhardi, Karl: Abdruck einer bisher unbekannten Schenkungsurkunde zu Gunsten des Stifts Hersfeld vom 29. Aug. 835 (854?). In: ZHG, Bd. 6 (1854), S. 351-355
https://books.google.de/books?id=a6VJAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA351
KlausGraf - am Mittwoch, 16. Mai 2012, 13:35 - Rubrik: Hilfswissenschaften
noch kein Kommentar - Kommentar verfassen
Von Edmund E. Stengel aus den 1920er Jahren, online, aber schlecht lesbar und wenig erheblich:
https://www.uni-marburg.de/fb06/mag/lba/veroeffentlichungen/pdfs-lba/bibliographie-stengel.pdf
https://www.uni-marburg.de/fb06/mag/lba/veroeffentlichungen/pdfs-lba/bibliographie-stengel.pdf
KlausGraf - am Donnerstag, 10. Mai 2012, 22:10 - Rubrik: Hilfswissenschaften
noch kein Kommentar - Kommentar verfassen
Der Reprint des extrem seltenen Werks von 1768 wurde digitalisiert und ins Internet Archive eingestellt:
https://archive.org/details/NuetzlichesHandlungs-woerter-buch
https://archive.org/details/NuetzlichesHandlungs-woerter-buch
KlausGraf - am Donnerstag, 10. Mai 2012, 20:38 - Rubrik: Hilfswissenschaften
noch kein Kommentar - Kommentar verfassen
Fragt Thomas Döring in der ML Provenienz. Es stammt aus einer Leipziger Plautus-Inkunabel (1490).

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Plautus_leipzig_Poet_lat_2_c.JPG
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Plautus_leipzig_Poet_lat_2_c.JPG
KlausGraf - am Donnerstag, 10. Mai 2012, 17:34 - Rubrik: Hilfswissenschaften
KlausGraf - am Mittwoch, 2. Mai 2012, 12:49 - Rubrik: Hilfswissenschaften
noch kein Kommentar - Kommentar verfassen
Ada Sturm - am Montag, 23. April 2012, 07:45 - Rubrik: Hilfswissenschaften
noch kein Kommentar - Kommentar verfassen